The trend is up, but price is in the upper half of its range. There is no entry the rule will stand behind here.
This decision is about entering, not about an existing position.
There is no entry here that the rule will stand behind.
That is the regime threshold — the level at which the rule itself changes state. It is not a forecast that price will reach it, and it is not the invalidation of this particular decision.
Setup invalidation: $2,636. Specific to this decision, separate from the regime threshold above.
This decision does not say what would change it. Nothing is invented to fill the gap.
Each row counts episodes — blocks of similar days, measured from the first day of each block. Their forward windows still overlap, so read them as rough observations, not separate bets. The worst column is a single historical extreme, not an estimate of your downside: it tells you such a loss has happened, not how likely it is.
Measured across BTC, ETH and SOL over nine years. The one thing here that holds up.
No entry trigger has been validated out-of-sample. There is no validated entry here, because none has been established.
No price target, no probability. The forecasting model was measured against a coin flip, lost, and was switched off.
trend evidence ≠ entry evidence ≠ prediction